About ToxicTrailers.com

ToxicTrailers.com was launched after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 when the government spent more than $2 billion on FEMA trailers with high levels of formaldehyde that sickened thousands of people. The FEMA trailer tragedy exposed what is a widespread problem in RVs, mobile homes, modular buildings and even conventional buildings that use pressed wood products. Unfortunately, as we approach the tenth anniversary of Katrina, formaldehyde regulations are not being enforced in the U.S., and people's health is at risk. If you are having burning eyes, congestion, sore throat, coughing, breathing difficulties, frequent sinus infections or rashes, and difficulties concentrating, you may have a formaldehyde problem. For questions or to share your story, write 4becky@cox.net.

Monday, June 18, 2018

Newmar Dutch Star Motorhome sickens owner

Our 2015 Newmar Dutch Star 4366 Model Motorhome was brand new when we purchased it. When I was in it, I had trouble breathing along with coughing and choking, and also could smell the formaldehyde gas. I was in the emergency room two times while on our first trip and again after we got home. The Newmar Motorhome was tested and the interior contains high levels of formaldehyde and ethyl alcohol. I have not been in it since the first trip. A doctor at Mayo Clinic told me to not step foot inside the RV without wearing a hazmat suit and a respirator. We had four formaldehyde tests done that were all high: 160 ppb, 151 ppb, 140 ppb and 120 ppb. The Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels Acute MRL is 40 ppb for 1-14 days of exposure and 30 ppb for 14-365 days exposure. To that we must add a reading of 15,605.53 ppb of ethyl alcohol. I have been told that the formaldehyde exposure alone was excessive. The ethyl alcohol was very high. That is why I have been ill for more than three years. Newmar refuses to buy back this motorhome. Linda Pingel, Iowa

Monday, May 28, 2018

EPA slows release of formaldehyde study

Very sad to see EPA once again working for industry instead of the people... Pressured by industry, U.S. EPA slows formaldehyde study release Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under pressure from the chemical industry, has delayed release of a study detailing cancer risks from formaldehyde, according to internal communications seen by Reuters, potentially keeping important health information from the public. Top EPA officials have declined to review the study or be briefed by its experts on the findings, the internal communications showed. The EPA already lists formaldehyde, used in building materials like plywood and foam insulation, as a probable carcinogen. The new report is expected for the first time to detail its links to leukemia. The report, an update of the EPA’s existing human health assessment of the widely used chemical, was completed by scientists from the agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) late last year and must go through a months-long internal review process before it can be issued to the public for comment. The delay could further heighten scrutiny of EPA, already fending off complaints that it and the White House considered blocking a study on water contamination by PFOA and PFOS, chemicals used in Teflon and firefighting. Politico reported on May 14 that a Trump administration aide had warned release of that study would cause a “public relations nightmare.” The Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit science advocacy group, said delaying the report fits a broader pattern of the agency’s political leadership interfering with public health research. “By sweeping scientific assessments under the rug, EPA fails to fulfill its mission of protecting public health. The public has the right to know about public health threats,” said Yogin Kothari, UCS Washington director. The EPA told Congress in early February it expected to start the agency review process for the formaldehyde assessment “shortly,” according to the EPA staff communications. But in follow-up communications between agency employees in late April, one career staffer wrote that EPA Chief of Staff Ryan Jackson, Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation Bill Wehrum, and Wehrum’s deputy Clint Woods had not given their permission to initiate the review and had refused offers from EPA scientists to brief them on it. “No office in the EPA is interested in formaldehyde,” the staffer wrote. The 60-to-90-day agency review and a subsequent inter-agency review of a similar duration must happen before the study can be issued for public comment. Prior to the communications, the chemistry industry’s main lobby group, the American Chemistry Council (ACC), had been pressuring the EPA to avoid drawing links between formaldehyde and leukemia in its assessment. EPA’s deputy assistant administrator of the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Nancy Beck, previously served as director of regulatory science policy at the ACC. Beck is not named in the communication.

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Here is a blog by Tom Neltner that is a good overview of the formaldehyde rule and what led up to it. Tom did a lot of work on this for years as a volunteer for Sierra Club. https://www.edf.org/XVo